雅思大作文寫作范文示例

雅思大作文寫作范文示例！2022年3月19日雅思大作文題目Many cities replace farmlands and parks with houses. Is it a positive or negative development?

范文及解析

Introduction

To meet the growing demand for housing, many cities occupy farmlands and parks for establishing residential areas. However, I regard this trend as short-sighted and detrimental.

解析

Urbanisation/ Urban planning母題下的題目。聯系現實，就目前大多數城市而言，農田可以舍棄，農場通常被遷到外部郊區;考慮到去年連出那么多現當代人缺乏運動的題，公園自然不可舍棄。

Body 1

This development has some positive effects. To commence, such a policy can to some extent alleviate the tension of house shortage in some cities. With the sea of people flooding into metropolises for the sake of seeking greater employment possibilities and a higher standard of living, the demand for house supply is increasing at an overwhelming rate. To offer those migrants shelter, the government thus has to construct more residential structures by removing farms which can be relocated to the outskirts and continue to yield crops and vegetables for food security. Besides, since urbanisation is an inevitable and irreversible trend, relocation of farmlands can make the area more fit the overall image of the modernised metropolitan city.

解析

好處：1. 外來人口增多，導致住房緊缺，這個問題可以得以緩解;2. 農田遷出，使城市規劃更統一

Ø alleviate vt. 緩解

Ø tension n. 緊張局勢

Ø flood vi. 大量到達

Ø metropolis n. 大都市

Ø shelter n.[U] 住處

Ø yield vt. 生產，產出

Body 2

However, the detriments that this development has must not be overlooked. This is mainly because the removal of parks may exert a negative impact on citizens’ level of health. As one of the fundamental parts of amenities, parks usually function as the places for residents’ physical exercises and other leisure activities. Once the parks are demolished, there will be either instances where people lead a sedentary lifestyle and further lack the awareness of exercising or instances where people find nowhere to release their pressure and smell the roses, thus incurring the declining level of health. Additionally, it is the parks with a high greening rate that absorb exhaust fumes and provide green shade.

解析

壞處：公園作為基礎便利設施，被舍棄，影響人們健康

Ø overlook vt. 忽視，忽略

Ø exert vt. 施加

Ø amenity n. <常作 amenities>生活福利設施;便利設施

Ø demolish vt. 拆毀，拆除(建筑物)

Ø sedentary adj. 久坐不動的

Ø smell the roses享受自然之美

Conclusion

In light of the above, it is justifiable to provide citizens with shelter by substituting places of residence for farmlands, but public facilities like parks should be maintained.